1.)01 SECONDS Essays - Alberta Provincial Electoral Districts

1.)01 SECONDS 2.)14 SECONDS 3.)A 4.)A,A,B,AAA,B,AAA,B,A A.. 1 SECS-14 SECS (13 SECONDS) A15 SECS-29 SECS (14 SECONDS) B..30SECS-43SECS( 13 SECONDS) A44 SECS-59 SECS (14 SECONDS) A1MIN-1 MIN 13 SECS ( 13 SECONDS) A1 MIN 14 SECS-1 MIN 28 SECS (14 SECONDS) B1 MIN 29 SECS-1 MIN 43 SECS ( 14 SECONDS) A1 MIN 44 SECS-1 MIN 58 SECS (14 SECONDS) A1 MIN 59 SECS-2 MIN 13 SECS (14 SECONDS) A2 MIN 14 SECS-2 MIN 28 SECS (14 SECONDS) B2 MIN 29 SECS-2 MIN 43 SECS (14 SECONDS) A2 MIN 44 SECS-3 MIN 17 SECS (17 SECONDS) In the beginning there seemed to be a pattern between the musical ideas, and the time the musical ideas last. For example, in the beginning, the time period of musical ideas was shifting from 13 (a) to 14(a) back to 13 (b) and so on. However towards the end, all the music ideas were 14 secs. and the pattern was lost. None of the ideas were in specific order, but musical idea A definitely was more used in this demonstration than musical idea B. Handel uses dynamics and timbre to create variety throughout this example by creating somewhat of a pattern with sound. For example, in the beginning of the song the melody was low and slow, and as the music kept going it seemed to be getting louder and faster. Not only did he change the volume he also changed his sound sources by bringing in more instruments which changed or intensified the different musical ideas incorporated in this piece.

Definition and Examples of English Morphology

Definition and Examples of English Morphology Morphology is the branch of linguistics (and one of the major components of grammar) that studies word structures, especially regarding morphemes, which are the smallest units of language. They can be base words or components that form words, such as affixes. The adjective form is  morphological. Morphology Over Time Traditionally, a basic distinction has been made between morphology- which is primarily concerned with the internal structures of words- and syntax, which is primarily concerned with how words are put together in sentences. The term morphology has been taken over from biology where it is used to denote the study of the forms of plants and animals ... It was first used for linguistic purposes in 1859 by the German linguist August Schleicher (Salmon 2000), to refer to the study of the form of words, noted Geert E. Booij, in An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2012) In recent decades, however, numerous linguists have challenged this distinction. See, for example, lexicogrammar and lexical-functional grammar (LFG), which consider the interrelationship- even interdependence- between words and grammar. Branches of and Approaches to Morphology The two branches of morphology include the study of the breaking apart (the analytic side) and the reassembling (the synthetic side) of words; to wit, inflectional morphology concerns the breaking apart of words into their parts, such as how suffixes make different verb forms. ​Lexical word formation, in contrast, concerns the construction of new base words, especially complex ones that come from multiple morphemes. Lexical word formation is also called lexical morphology and derivational morphology. Author David Crystal gives these examples: For English, [morphology] means devising ways of describing the properties of such disparate items as a, horse, took, indescribable, washing machine, and antidisestablishmentarianism. A widely recognized approach divides the field into two domains: lexical or derivational morphology studies the way in which new items of vocabulary can be built up out of combinations of elements (as in the case of in-describ-able); inflectional morphology studies the ways words vary in their form in order to express a grammatical contrast (as in the case of horses, where the ending marks plurality). (The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2003) And authors Mark Aronoff and Kirsten Fuderman also discuss and give examples of the two approaches this way: The analytic approach has to do with breaking words  down, and it is usually associated with American structuralist linguistics of the first  half of the twentieth century....No matter what language were looking at,  we need analytic methods that are independent of the structures we are examining; preconceived notions might interfere with an objective, scientific analysis. This is especially true when dealing with unfamiliar languages.The second approach to morphology is more often associated with theory than with methodology, perhaps unfairly. This is the synthetic approach. It basically says, I have a lot of little pieces here. How do I put them together? This question presupposes that you already know what the pieces are. Analysis must in some way precede synthesis. (Mark Aronoff and Kirsten Fudeman, What Is Morphology? 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011)